John

Overview: John hasn't posted a review in over a week. What's the deal with that guy?

[Written by special guest reviewer Ann Coulter]

Leave it to the liberal media to give Brooks a free pass. I'm sure they're all too busy highlighting their favorite passages from "The Communist Manifesto" and drooling over the latest anti-American propaganda piece by Paul Krugman - propped up by the geniuses at the ultra-left (un)American journal of record, the New York Times - detailing how, exactly, the election of socialist candidate Barack Hussein Osama to the highest office in the land will not inevitably lead to the collapse of the Republic.


Word from the hate-mongering liberal spin machine is that Brooks has been "busy": liberal shorthand for "devoting more time corrupting the American way of life", usually through coddling terrorists, celebrating French holidays, strongarming Congress to enact a National Baby-killing Day (for which all abortion Doctors would be given an honorary day off, one they would likely not take, as it might interfere with their precious ritual of murdering babies), or whining about how they can't get married to the "person" they "love", because we "bigotted" conservatives won't recognize the holy union of a man and his ferret.


But you don't hear about any of that on MSNBC. Imagine, if you will, the way the LM would get their panties in a bunch if President Bush ever took a "week off". Imagine the cries of outrage if Bill O'Reilly ever took a "week off". How would the LM spin that?

"Oh, O'Reilly isn't a real journalist! He's not commited to his craft! He doesn't care about getting true-red Americans the truth!"


What they don't tell you is, unlike Brooks, who right now is probably burning an effigy of Jesus in the fireplace of the executive lounge at the W Hotel and sprinkling embryonic stems cells on his organic avocado and butternut squash salad as he enjoys a relaxing lunch with Richard Dawkins and John Edwards as they consider more effective means of destroying freedom and demonizing Jefferson, when Bill O'Reilly takes a week off, he lets other responsible truth-tellers who love their country and their savior-and/or-Israel take over for him: people like Sean Hannity and myself.


And what does Brooks, whose anarchistic and atheistic liberal bias on issues like cookies and women's rights have plagued this site and helped further sodomize the American Way of Life, do? More than a week after his last post, he invites me to share my views on him.

Typical anti-American liberal tactic.


I suppose in between celebrating 9/11 and bribing liberal activist judges to rule in the bench, he realized his site actually needed some content, so he brings in a best-selling author like myself to raise his profile and prove that he's "open-minded" to dissent.


Funny how liberals love to talk about how important it is to maintain dissent in America, isn't it? It's quite convenient for them when they can rail against the courage of our President for overthrowing a dictator and tell our troops in Iraq they should cut and run and they're all weak failures and murderers.


But heaven forbid somebody disagree with them, with dissenting opinions such as "Whether they are defending the Soviet Union or bleating for Saddam Hussein, liberals are always against America. They are either traitors or idiots, and on the matter of America's self-preservation, the difference is irrelevant", or "We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity", or "Liberals become indignant when you question their patriotism, but simultaneously work overtime to give terrorists a cushion for the next attack and laugh at dumb Americans who love their country and hate the enemy", or "My only regret with Timothy McVeigh is he did not go to the New York Times Building", or "Earth is yours. Take it. Rape it. It's yours", or "If I'm going to say anything about John Edwards in the future, I'll just wish he had been killed in a terrorist assassination plot", or "We need somebody to put rat poisoning in Justice Stevens' creme brulee. That's just a joke, for you in the media."**

**(Editor's note: these are all actual Ann Coulter quotes)


And did anybody notice that when I suggested murdering a member of the United States Supreme Court that I specifically noted that I was joking?


Well, some people did. But not others. I'll give you a hint as to WHO: they spend a lot of time arguing for a married gay couple's right to abort their test-tube babies, and they run the media.

The same people, I might add, who didn't seem to mind an entire week of this site not being updated and would take Brooks at his gay-loving, abortion-party-throwing, Jesus-re-crucifying word that he swears he will have two or perhaps three posts next week, starting no later than this Saturday.


I seem to recall a certain President swearing to uphold the Constitution not that many years ago. I do not, however, recall anything in the Constitution that mandates oral sex with an overweight intern.


That should tell you how much a liberal's "word" is worth.


In closing, I forgot to say "fag".


-Ann



Ann Coulter (above) is the best-selling author of "Slander!: Liberal Lies About the American Right", "Treason!: Liberal Treachery from the Cold War to the War on Terrorism", "Godless!: The Church of Liberalism", "Murder!: The Victims of Liberal Homicidal Mania, From Jesus to Freedom", and the upcoming "Ransom!: Give Me $20 or I'll Stab Your Puppy"